Citizen journalism is
ordinary people reporting and sharing information.
Some news
corporations are supporting citizen journalism.
Social media is one
of the domains for citizen journalism.
According to TheGuardian, a British news website, social
media and citizen journalism is not only affecting the news corporations, but
the documentary makers as well. During the past incidents in the Middle East,
citizens would capture footage of events using the cameras on their cell
phones. This footage is being incorporated into documentaries of those events
and is a primary source for filmmakers. Social media sites are allowing
witnesses to come out with their stories and share them. The witnesses can
easily voice their seeing and recollection of events by simply posting
pictures, videos, or text stating how they recalled the events.
Citizen journalism is
now classified as normal media coverage and is allowed to cover court cases in
the state of Massachusetts.
The highest court in the state of Massachusetts has now
introduced an online registration process for citizens and other news
organizations to use electronic devices and cameras during court hearings. In
addition to the new registration process, the court amended Rule 1:19, the
state’s camera-in-the-courtroom statute. One amended part defined media to
include citizen journalists “who are regularly engaged in the reporting and
publishing of news or information about matters of public interest.” The other
amended part allowed—given permission from the judge—journalists to use
smartphones, laptops, tablets, and other devices to record the hearings,
including live-blogs. This is a huge step for the social media and the citizen
journalists who use it. Not only are citizens classified as journalists and
categorized with other news organizations, but they are also given permission
to cover the hearings with electronic devices, taking advantage of the quick
distribution effect of social media. Viewers will now be able to keep up to
date with rulings as they occur, without delay. Massachusetts’s court
information will now be spread much more efficiently with the amendment made to
Rule 1:19.
With the rise in citizen journalists and their articles,
come critics that view the whole concept as “untrustworthy, shoddy and
inarticulate.” Jack Kapica, an experienced Canadian journalist, worries that
citizen journalists just simply “mimic what they see on TV or in the press, to
varying degrees of success.” He continues his statement by mentioning that the
journalists demonstrate little understanding of the concepts used to gather and
present information in a “conventional form.” Other than the style of the way
citizen journalists typically write, Jack says that the amateurs usually lack
ways to create original content.
According to Jack, citizens do not comprehend the “necessity of interviewing
people and quoting them” and “the value of original quotes cannot be
overstated. “ If the citizens just take quotes from the mainstream media, then
they are just that—mainstream media. With all the criticism, Jack remains
optimistic about the future of citizen journalism because “when done correctly,
it can be very powerful [due to] its speed and the ability of the fledgling industry to be anywhere at any time.”
Overall, citizen journalism has changed to
become a major part of news.
New social media sites, faster electronic devices, updated
laws, and cooperation with major news organizations all help the growth of
citizen journalism. If the amateur journalists
can uphold a high standard of writing and follow basic principles of
journalism, then their stories will not need to face criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment